Views from the Bridge

Thoughts on computers, companies and the equally puzzling humans who interact with them

0 notes

Danegeld 2.0 *

Earlier this week, I was wickedly amused to read that the makers of the Abercrombie & Fitch line of clothing were offering to pay the cast of MTV’s Jersey Shore to refrain from wearing their togs, citing concerns about their brand’s image. (Cue Billy Joel: “Where have you been hidin’ out lately, honey? You can’t dress trashy ‘till you spend a lotta money.”) I was further amused when one of my classmates from Programmer’s School picked up on that, offering to do the same for a substantially reduced price. And then, tonight, a librarian friend was having a Facebook conniption about Kourtney Kardashian’s “librarian” get-up, which was also worth an evil laugh.

One of the downsides of the democratization in time-wasting brought to us by the internet is that celebrity can simultaneously more far-flung and more fleeting than ever before. But for the enterprising (but otherwise talent-free) flash-in-the-pan, this opens up all manner of opportunity.  The obvious examples:

  • Trust fund do-nothings (think Paris Hilton as well as the afore-mentioned Kardashians)
  • Washed-up tween-idols (e.g. Britney Spears, The Biebs 5 years hence)
  • Serial rehabbers (i.e. Charlie Sheen, Lindsay Lohan)

Any of such otherwise useless members of society can thus fund plastic surgery or maybe a beach house—or at least the next bail—by being bought off by brands afraid of offending their more mainstream retailers.  Yep, I can’t help but think that Abercrombie & Fitch let the proverbial genie out of the bottle here.

Granted, such tactics won’t be 100% successful. Some companies, after all, deliberately court controversy for an “edgy” image. (Look no further than the in-your-face product placements for VirginMobile, PlentyOfFish.com and Polaroid) in Lady Gaga’s Telephone (NSFW version)).

But such failure is all part of my cunning plan. See, I figure I can eventually graduate to video blogging. In my “office” cleverly disguised as a spare bedroom…complete with full menagerie of stuffed animals. The current wardrobe—A green men’s T-shirt and blue-striped white boxer shorts—will more than suffice. As will the humidity-frizzed hair. And the make-up that hasn’t been re-touched since early afternoon.

With such anti-hipster cred. at my fingertips, I should really learn how to use it responsibly. Yeah. Nice image you go goin’ there, Apple. It’d be an awful shame if I were to, say, “accidentally” flash your latest product around in front of my webcam…  Ohai, Coca-Cola…oh, I’m sorry:  Did I leave that can out in plain sight?  My bad.  Here, let me tuck it back into one of a dozen cases under the spare bed.  Yes, that spare bed—the one with the wrinkled Martha Stewart bedspread, and the “Euro-shams” that look like a deflated meringue, what with the way I just wadded the pillows into them and all…

You get the idea:

Step 1:  Videoblogging stardom
Step 2:  Blatant extortion
Step 3:  Profit!

Eh.  I can think of worse ways to feather the nest.  And at least I’m finally getting some mileage from the un-coolness that I’ve been building up since grade school…

- - - - -

* Historical note:  Protection rackets go by many names—most notably the Orwellian “War on Terror” in our day and age—but few were ever so successful or wide-ranging as the Danegeld.  Wagnerian/Victorian horned-helmet idiocies aside, the Vikings were a remarkable people in many ways, with a presence ranging from Constantinople (where they formed the bodyguard of the Byzantine Emperor) to Eastern Canada (L’Anse Aux Meadows in the province of Newfoundland-Labrador).  And they were apparently skilled enough with…errr…”international brand recognition” to be able to extort tribute from points as distant as Saxon/Norman England, Christian Spain and western Russia.  And it is in honor of the, um, “business acumen” of my husband’s ancestors that this post is titled.

Filed under Frivolous Friday Navel-gazing